Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Development of hydroxyapatite-based nanomaterials to enhance biological response of osteoblast cells for clinical application

Jian Li1, Yaping Liu2, Kun Li3, Haitao Meng1

1Department of Bone and Joint Surgery; 2Department of Endocrinology, Jining First People's Hospital, Jining City, 272100; 3Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan City, Shandong Province, 250031, China.

For correspondence:-  Haitao Meng   Email: menghaitao1969@hotmail.com   Tel:+865372253431

Received: 26 September 2015        Accepted: 5 August 2016        Published: 30 September 2016

Citation: Li J, Liu Y, Li K, Meng H. Development of hydroxyapatite-based nanomaterials to enhance biological response of osteoblast cells for clinical application. Trop J Pharm Res 2016; 15(9):1827-1832 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v15i9.2

© 2016 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a novel chitosan/gelatin-hydroxyapatite (CGHaP) microspheres for evaluating the biological response of pre-osteoblast cells.
Methods: The microsphere was prepared by water-in-oil emulsion method. Cell proliferation was studied using AlamarBlue colorimetric assay and DAPI staining while alkaline phosphatase assay was carried out by colorimetric assay method. Chitosan microspheres as well as chitosan-hydroxyapatite microspheres was prepared and tested for biological response from MC3T3-E1 cell line.
Results: The results showed that CGHaP promotes MC3T3-E1 cell proliferation and spread on the surface of microspheres. The cells were clustered with more actin filaments and well-linked with neighbouring cells or adjacent cells when cultured in CGHaP microspheres whereas fewer cells were spread on chitosan (CH) microspheres. CGHaP microspheres significantly (p < 0.05) promoted cell attachment, proliferation and extracellular matrix mineralization. CGHaP microspheres presented significantly (p < 0.02) higher calcium deposition (0.5 ng) than CH microspheres (0.28 ng). Specifically, CGHaP microspheres exhibited high ALP activity (8 units; 2-fold) compared to CH with 3 units, after 7 days of incubation. The results suggest that CGHaP possesses a great ability to facilitate bone ingrowth formation and possibility of good osteointegration in vivo.
Conclusion: The nanomaterial enhances the proliferation of pre-osteoblast cells in tissue engineering microspheres. The outcome of this study may have a major impact on the development of novel nanomaterials for bone tissue engineering.

Keywords: Chitosan/gelatin-hydroxyapatite, Osteoblast, Osteoinduction, Bone tissue engineering, Nanomaterials, Microspheres, Calcium nodule formation

Introduction

Nanomaterial that can mimic the critical aspects of natural biological processes will be much suitable for the tissue engineering. In recent years, organic-inorganic hybrid nanomaterials have been center of research due to its remarkable applications in biomedical field [1,2]. In this regard, hydroxyapatite (HA) {Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2} is a biological active calcium phosphate ceramic which is used to mimic bone in orthopedic surgery [3,4]. The excellent biocompatibility, bioactivity and osteoconductivity make it a natural choice for bone applications. However, nanocomposite materials of HA needs to be developed for bone tissue applications. In search of environment friendly materials from natural source which can be efficiently combined with the HA, we have selected chitosan (CS) and gelatin (GL) as a potential candidate due to its excellent properties such as biocompatibility, non- immunogenicity,  non-cytotoxicity, mucus  adhesion,  and  low  cost [5,6]. CS/GL when combined with the HA is expected to bring much needed flexibility to the composite materials. Moreover, CS/GL is a natural polysaccharide which is biodegradable under in vivo conditions (due to lysozyme) [7,8]. With the single aim of controlling the proliferation, differentiation and bone-forming activities, we have designed microsphere which has large surface area for the cell growth. It has been reported that proliferation of osteoblast cells and osteogenic differentiation is utmost important for the bone tissue regeneration and the materials which promotes such activities are osteogenic agents [9,10].

To best of our knowledge, we are the first group to report the in vitro osteoblast cell response in chitosan/gelatin-hydroxyapatite (CGHaP) microspheres. In this study, chitosan microspheres as well as chitosan-hydroxyapatite microspheres was prepared and biological response of MC3T3-E1 cell was studied. Specifically, cell proliferation, cell spreading, bone forming ability, calcium content, as well as extracellular matrix mineralization was evaluated.

Methods

Materials

Chitosan (CS) with degree of deacetylation (> 90 %) was obtained as a kind gift from Shanghai Bio Life Science and Technology Ltd. Gelatin and hydroxyapatite was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, China. All chemicals were used without further purification.

Preparation of chitosan/gelatin-hydroxy-apatite (CGHaP) microsphere

The CGHaP microsphere was preparing by water-in-oil emulsion method. In brief, 2:1 weight ratio of chitosan/gelatin was dissolved in 50 ml of acetic acid (0.1 N) solution. A fixed concentration of HaP was added to this solution and sonicated for 10 min to form a homogenous dispersion of polymer and inorganic molecules. Similarly, microspheres with HaP were also prepared as a control to compare. The amine groups present in the chitosan and gelatin were crosslinked by the addition of 2.5 % glutaraldehyde. The resulting microspheres were washed 5 - 6 times with acetone and rinsed with double distilled water. In addition, residual glutaraldehyde was neutralized by keeping the microsphere in 2 % sodium bisulfide for 24 h and then followed by repeated washing with water. The microspheres were then lyophilized using an automated freeze dryer.

Morphological characterization

The morphology and proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells in CH and CGHaP microspheres were evaluated by an optical microscope (Olympus, Germany). Earlier, MC3T3-E1 cells were incubated with respective microspheres for 4 days and after the designated time point, microspheres were washed, and fixed with 4 % glutaraldehyde. After fixing, samples were rinsed with DI water and dehydrated with sequential incubations of 20, 40, 60, 80, 90 and 100 % ethanol in DI water for 15 min at each concentration and observed under light microscope. Samples were sterilized with 70 % ethanol and washed thoroughly with PBS prior to cell seeding.

Cell proliferation

The cell proliferation was studied using AlamarBlue colorimetric assay. Briefly, cells were seeded in a 6-well plate along with CH and CGHaP microspheres and incubated for 1, 4, and 7 days, respectively. After incubation, well plates were washed twice with PBS and incubated in 10 % (v/v) AlamarBlue in DMEM with 10 % FBS for 2 h at 37 oC. The solution was transferred to a 96-well plate and fluorescence was read in 560 nm using a spectrophotometer (SpectraMax, USA).

Mineralization assay

Cells after 7 days incubation were washed and soaked in 1 M acetic acid overnight. The solution was then collected and absorbance was measured at 610 as per the manufacturer’s protocol of calcium assay kit (Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, China).

Cell proliferation by DAPI staining

Same procedure was employed as mentioned under colorimetric assay method. In addition, cells were stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 0.5 μg/mL) for 15 min. After DAPI staining, cells were fixed and observed under confocal microscopy (Nikon, Japan).

Cell spreading analysis

The spreading of MC3T3-E1 was studied by observing the cytoskeleton of cells. After 3 days of incubation, samples were washed to remove the unattached cells and cells on the microspheres were fixed with 4 % PFA and permeabilized with 0.1 % Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min. The cells were then stained with rhodamine-phalloidin for 45 min and visualized under confocal laser scanning microscope (Nikon, Japan).

Alkaline phosphatase assay

Same procedure was employed as mentioned under colorimetric assay method. After 7 days of incubation, ALP activity was evaluated by determining the amount of p-nitrophenol using an ALP microplate test kit. The amount of ALP in the each case was measured at 405 nm using an automated microplate reader.

Alizarin-red staining assay

Cells after 7 days incubation were washed twice with PBS and fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 20 min before being stained with 1 % Alizarin-red solution for 1 h. The samples were washed with distilled water and dried. For the quantitative analysis, orange dye was dissolved in 10 % cetylpyridinium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich, China) in 10 mm sodium phosphate solution and the absorbance was measured at 620 nm using an automated microplate reader.

Statistical analysis

All the data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD, n = 3), and were analyzed by one-way variance analysis (ANOVA) with SPSS 11.0 software. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Cell spread

The cell spreading was clearly visible in both the microspheres; however what is more interesting is the fact that MC3T3-E1 cells spread preferably better in the CGHaP microspheres with numerous pseudopods anchored to the microsphere surface and present as characteristic cuboidal morphology ().

Cell spread was further confirmed by observing the cytoskeleton of cells after staining with rhodamine-phalloidin. CGHaP microspheres showed a confluent and multilayer morphology of cells (data not shown). Moreover, cells were clustered with more actin filaments and well-linked with neighbouring cells or adjacent cells. In contrast, cells in the CH microsphere presented fewer actin filaments and cells were present as monolayer. The cell spreading from rhodamine staining was consistent with the SEM based morphology analysis.

Cell proliferation

The cell proliferation capacity of MC3T3-E1 cells in CH and CGHaP microspheres were evaluated by AlamarBlue colorimetric assay. As seen (), HaP containing microspheres significantly (p < 0.05) promoted the cell proliferation when compared with the microspheres which do not have HaP. This indicates that the incorporation of HaP into composite microspheres greatly encourages attached cells to proliferate, especially at day 7, suggesting a high affinity of pre-osteoblasts (MC3T3-E1) for HaP.

The cell proliferation was further confirmed by DAPI staining (). The results clearly showed that cells grown on HaP microspheres exhibited remarkable blue fluorescence corresponding to the high cell proliferation.

Extracellular matrix mineralization

The calcium content from each group was quantified to evaluate the calcium deposition. The CGHaP microspheres presented the significantly (p < 0.02) higher calcium deposition (0.5 ng) than CH microspheres (0.28 ng). The remarkably calcium secretion was attributed to the presence of HaP in the medium and its nanoscale features.

ALP staining

Similarly, CGHaP microspheres showed stronger induction of ALP than compared to that of CH microspheres. Consistently, CGHaP microspheres showed a high ALP activity (8 unit; 2-fold) while CH showed lesser ALP activity (3 unit) after 7 days incubation.

Alizarin-red staining

Consistent with the ALP staining analysis, CGHaP microspheres showed a stronger and clearer Alizarin-red staining after 7 days of incubation (b). Approximately, 4-fold higher intensity (p < 0.02) was observed than compared to that of CH microspheres. It has been reported that Alizarin-red staining is an important technique to evaluate the calcium nodules which corresponds to extracellular mineralization. Based on the result, it is clear that presence of HaP promoted the formation of calcium nodule formation and could promote the eventual cell differentiation.

Discussion

In this paper, chitosan/gelatin-hydroxyapatite microsphere was fabricated as a novel nanomaterial to improve the clinical performance in case of bone regeneration. HaP containing microspheres would allow the cell proliferation in the in vivo conditions. This microsphere has unique advantage of loading with proteins or growth factor or suitable drugs. HaP is expected to increase the in vitro calcification and cell proliferation. The mean size of CH microsphere was ~15 µm; however, addition of HaP along with gelatin increased the average size to ~35 µm. This is mainly ascribed to an increase in the viscosity of the HA-containing gelatin/chitosan solution. The resulting increase in the mean diameters by HA incorporation was also reported in other research that dealt with the fabrication of HA-embedded polymeric microspheres.

The high spread of cells in HaP containing microsphere was attributed to the bone-loving property of MC3T3-E1 cells wherein they exhibited a flattened shape. In contrast, fewer cells were observed in CH microspheres due to the absence of bone elements (HaP). Generally, cell attached and followed by spreading is the first and foremost step in the interaction of cells with the complimentary materials and its growth could be affected by the nature of materials [11].

The cell proliferation capacity of MC3T3-E1 cells in CH and CGHaP microspheres were evaluated by AlamarBlue colorimetric assay. Two kinds of observations could be made from this proliferation assay. First, limited cell proliferation in case of control was attributed to the lack of surface for spreading. Second, high proliferation in case of microspheres (especially HaP one) was attributed to the high surface area and suitable environment. Nearly, 2-fold higher cell proliferation was observed in this case. Enhanced cytocompatibility was evident for the HaP-containing microspheres, as cells showed a faster growth rate than on bare chitosan microspheres [12,13]

The CGHaP microspheres showed high mineralization capacity which would be a great boon for the bone tissue engineering. Consistently, CGHaP microspheres showed a high ALP activity (2-fold) while CH showed lesser ALP activity after 7 days incubation. Studies have shown that HaP can stimulate the cell proliferation of human and animal osteoblasts. Thus, the active effect on the cell proliferation of the composite was mainly attributed to the biological benefits of HaP.

Conclusion

Chitosan/gelatin-hydroxyapatite (CGHaP) micro-spheres have been successfully formulated. The presence of hydroxyapatite in the microspheres remarkably promotes MC3T3-E1 cell proliferation and spread on the surface of the microspheres which paves way for facilitated bone ingrowth formation and possibility of good osteointegration. The ability of CGHaP microspheres to promote cell attachment and extracellular matrix mineralization will further facilitate bone tissue engineering. Overall, the results indicate that the presence of HaP in composite microspheres increases surface roughness and protein affinity, thereby enhancing biological response. The outcome of present study would have a great impact on the development of novel nanomaterials for bone tissue engineering with potential clinical applications.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The study was funded from Technical Grant of Jining First People’s Hospital, China.

References

  1. Shakir M, Jolly R, Khan MS, Iram N, Sharma TK, Al-Resayes SI. Synthesis and characterization of a nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan/polyethylene glycol nano-composite for bone tissue engineering. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2015; 26: 41–48
  2. Murugan R, Ramakrishna S. Bioresorbable composite bone paste using polysaccharide based nano hydroxyapatite. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 3829–3835.
  3. Jiang H, Zuo Y, Zou Q, Wang H, Du J, Li Y, Yang X. Biomimetic spiral-cylindrical scaffold based on hybrid chitosan/cellulose/nano-hydroxyapatite membrane for bone regeneration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013; 5: 12036–12044.
  4. Lei Y, Guan JJ, Chen W, Ke QF, Zhang CQ, Guo YP. Fabrication of hydroxyapatite/chitosan porous materials for Pb(II) removal from aqueous solution. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 25462–25470.
  5. Bansal V, Sharma PK, Sharma N, Pal OP, Malviya R. Applications of chitosan and chitosan derivatives in drug delivery. Adv. Biol. Res. 2011; 5: 28–37.
  6. Bernkop-Schnürch A, Dünnhaupt S. Chitosan-based drug delivery systems. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2012; 81: 463–469.
  7. Laurencin CT, Ashe KM, Henry N, Kan HM, Lo KWH. Delivery of small molecules for bone regenerative engineering: preclinical studies and potential clinical applications. Drug Discov. Today 2014; 19: 794–800.
  8. Sonia T, Sharma CP. Chitosan and its derivatives for drug delivery perspective, in: Chitosan for Biomaterials I, Springer 2011; 23–53
  9. Kikuchi M, Itoh S, Ichinose S, Shinomiya K, Tanaka J. Self-organization mechanism in a bone-like hydroxyapatite/collagen nanocomposite synthesized in vitro and its biological reaction in vivo. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 1705.
  10. Toworfe GK, Composto RJ, Shapiro IM, Ducheyne P. Nucleation and growth of calcium phosphate on amine-, carboxyl- and hydroxyl-silane self-assembled monolayers. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 631
  11. Györgyey Á, Ungvári K, Kecskeméti G, Kopniczky J, Hopp B, Oszkó A, Pelsöczi I, Rakonczay Z, Nagy K, Turzó K. Attachment and proliferation of human osteoblast-like cells (MG-63) on laser-ablated titanium implant material. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2013; 33: 4251–4259.
  12. Tan H, Guo S, Yang S, Xu X, Tang T. Physical characterization and osteogenic activity of the quaternized chitosan-loaded PMMA bone cement. Acta Biomater. 2012; 8: 2166–2174.
  13. Lee M, Li W, Siu RK, Whang J, Zhang X, Soo C, Ting K, Wu B. M. Biomimetic apatite-coated alginate/chitosan microparticles as osteogenic protein carriers. Biomaterials, 2009; 30: 6094–6101.
Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates